#everydayquiz #Read Daily #TheHindu #BusinessStandard #IndianExpress #TheGuardian #TheNewYorkTimes #TheDawn
THE HINDU: Referendum gamble for Britain
British
Prime Minister David Cameron
wants London to stay in and out of the European Union (EU) all at the same time, and his
counterparts would let it be.
Regardless of the result in the June 23 in-out
referendum on the question of the U.K.’s EU membership, the difficult and delicate
deal stitched together among the leaders of the 28-member bloc carries immense
diplomatic significance and value for its near future. The slogan of
ever-closer integration in Europe may have carried some romantic appeal in a
world recovering from the ravages of the two great wars. It may not be so
compelling any longer. The enlargement of the original bloc of six countries
into what is today a gigantic transnational entity of 28 is forcing the leaders
of as many sovereign states to confront, from their individual perspectives,
the cumulative and complex realities of competing nationalisms. As for Britain,
the question whether it should stay or leave the EU has overshadowed the better
part of the forty-plus years of its membership since 1973. Now, in the midst of
the influx of immigrants in their millions from North Africa and West Asia, the
U.K. feels the urgency to define its equation with the rest of the bloc in more
precise terms. “Live and let live,” Mr. Cameron told his counterparts in
Brussels, as he secured safeguards for the minority of non-eurozone states,
significant in view of London’s large financial services industry.
For their part, EU leaders, while increasingly wary of
the U.K.’s persistent and shrill eurosceptic stance, would not easily reconcile
to the idea of the exit of one of the continent’s biggest economies, one with
immense international clout and a permanent UN Security Council seat. There was
implicit, if unspoken, appreciation in Berlin, Paris and Brussels in recent
months that the prospect of a Brexit would not bode well politically for the
bloc, as much as a Grexit would severely dent the project of the single
currency, now nearing completion of two decades. That Britain is in a minority
of countries that neither share the euro nor participate in the Schengen
border-free zone does not diminish its weight and importance in the larger EU
framework. Conversely, the exemption of Britain from ever-closer integration in
the Union — a founding principle — promised in the latest agreement, represents
an important, if symbolic, selling point for Mr. Cameron. Several Conservative
euro-sceptics, both within and outside the Cabinet, are to campaign for an
outright exit in the coming referendum. In a compromise, Mr. Cameron had to
concede the retention, with some modifications, of benefit payments to
immigrant workers and their children from within the EU. On both, the original
unrealistic position favoured an outright ban. The Leave Campaign will
undoubtedly view these changes as carrying little substance against their
decided position. Despite the uncertainty over the outcome of the June vote, it
is hard to imagine the British public being excited into exit mode,
notwithstanding a frenzied media campaign.
ref·er·en·dum
A general vote
by the electorate on a single political question that has been referred to them
for a direct decision.
coun·ter·part
A person or
thing holding a position or performing a function that corresponds to that of
another person or thing in another place.
rav·age
Cause severe
and extensive damage to.
o·ver·shad·ow
Tower above
and cast a shadow over.
war·y
Feeling or
showing caution about possible dangers or problems.
shrill
(of a voice or
sound) high-pitched and piercing.
Eu·ro·skep·tic
A person who
is opposed to increasing the powers of the European Union.
rec·on·cile
Restore
friendly relations between.
clout
A heavy blow
with the hand or a hard object.
power and influence over
other people or events
bode well
to be a sign of
something that will happen in
the future, usually something very good or bad:
con·verse·ly
Introducing a
statement or idea that reverses one that has just been made or referred to.
con·cede
Admit that
something is true or valid after first denying or resisting it.
out·right
Altogether;
completely.
fren·zied
Wildly excited
or uncontrolled.
THE HINDU: Stark reminder in Jammu & Kashmir
The gunfight between militants and the
security forces in Pampore, near Srinagar, that went on for three days
since Saturday is a stark reminder that in Jammu and Kashmir embers can flare
up any moment, and that with summer approaching there needs to be greater
political determination in dealing with law and order. The stand-off started
when a group of heavily armed militants opened fire on a convoy, targeting
especially a Central Reserve Police Force bus. The CRPF lost head constable
driver R.K. Rana, who was driving the bus, and head constable Bhola Singh,
while several other jawans were injured. The militants then ran into the
compound of the Entrepreneurship Development Institute, along the
Srinagar-Jammu national highway. The gun battle has already resulted in grave
and unacceptably high casualties — three Army men, two CRPF personnel and a
civilian. What is especially worrying, and must force military planners and the
political top brass in New Delhi to sit up and take note, is the death of three
elite para commandos of the Army. India cannot afford to keep losing its young
men with such dreary frequency.
The attack in Pampore follows a new pattern emerging in
Jammu and Kashmir in recent months. Violence had been steadily dwindling until
2014, when for various reasons it picked up pace again in the Valley. In part,
it was because the previous United Progressive Alliance government had failed
to politically exploit the opening presented by the ebbing of militancy in the
State. An all-out effort at that point would have helped the Manmohan Singh
government find a possible breakthrough in bringing peace back to Kashmir. That
would have entailed an honourable settlement of grievances of all sides, and
resulted in ending the deployment of almost half a million Indian soldiers in
the State. Unfortunately, the level of violence in Kashmir has been steadily
climbing since the Narendra Modi government came to power, but a political
opportunity presented itself in early 2015 when, in a
master stroke, the Bharatiya Janata Party sewed up a coalition government
with the Peoples Democratic Party. That was seen to be the first step in the
peace process, bringing political determination on the part of New Delhi behind
the PDP’s healing touch. However, the initial efforts have floundered,
especially since the death of
Mufti Mohammad Sayeed. Violence in the State has also steadily increased in
recent months, with many incidents claiming an unusually high toll of security
forces and civilians. What is most noticeable about the present phase of
violence is that many attacks are carried out by home-grown militants, a new
wave of youngsters from within the Indian borders who have taken to violence,
in recent times. A steady stream of militants infiltrating from Pakistan keeps
the pot boiling. All this is
happening during Governor’s Rule, while political parties allow the
situation to drift in order that they may hammer out a beneficial alliance
deal. The Centre and all the stakeholders must address the challenge of the
growing alienation among Kashmiris.
stark
Severe or bare
in appearance or outline.
Go on
to continue or move to the next thing
em·ber
A small piece
of burning or glowing coal or wood in a dying fire.
flare up
a situation in which
something such as violence, pain, or anger suddenly starts or gets much worse
stand-off
a situation in which agreement in an argument does not seem possible
con·voy
A group of
ships or vehicles traveling together, typically accompanied by armed troops,
warships, or other vehicles for protection.
dwin·dle
Diminish
gradually in size, amount, or strength.
ebb
(of tidewater)
move away from the land; recede.
en·tail
Involve
(something) as a necessary or inevitable part or consequence.
floun·der
Struggle or
stagger helplessly or clumsily in water or mud.
in·fil·trate
Enter or gain
access to (an organization, place, etc.) surreptitiously and gradually,
especially in order to acquire secret information.
The Guardian Observer view on presidential
elections in Uganda
Yoweri
Museveni has had a good run.
Having seized power in Uganda in 1986, he has held the presidency ever since.
As guerrilla leader turned politician-statesman, Museveni fitted the late
20th-century leadership profile that predominated in post-colonial Africa.
Where once the heinous dictatorship of Idi Amin held sway, the Museveni era
brought a democratic reformation. Where once chaos reigned, his strong grip on
the fledgling state brought stability and, for many Ugandans, a degree of
economic security and gradual social progress.
It is a pity
Museveni is jeopardising all that now. By grabbing at a fifth consecutive term
at the age of 71, while security forces simultaneously oppress his rivals, beat
their supporters and disrupt voting, he risks tarnishing a legacy of achievement
that, though modest, might have ensured him a respected place in Uganda’s
history. He just cannot let go of power, it seems. He may thus come to be
remembered for less creditable reasons.
The disconnect between Uganda’s past and present is
obvious. The average age of the country’s 38 million people is 15. Most
Ugandans were not even born when Museveni took office. The priorities of this
electorate include jobs, education, free speech and open debate, an end to
corruption and engagement with the world. They barely know the old man in the
State House. His outlook and prejudices, including his notorious anti-gay record, belong to
another age. These new citizens take the stability he established for granted,
while increasingly balking at the means used to maintain it.
Kizza Besigye, who apparently came second to Museveni in
last week’s presidential election, was briefly arrested shortly before the
vote. He has already promised a campaign of “defiance” if, as seems certain, he
deems the polls not free and fair. Opposition rallies have been disrupted,
social media shut down and independent news organisations intimidated and
harassed. There appear to have been serious irregularities in the opposition
strongholds of Kampala and Wakiso, where voting was delayed or did not proceed
at all. On Friday, police raided Besigye’s party headquarters, detaining him again for specious reasons.
Uganda has been here before. Protests after the previous
presidential election in 2011 produced a violent security crackdown. Given the
apparent margin of the president’s victory, stemming from his traditional,
strong support in rural areas where 80% of Ugandans live, and given the
extensive state security apparatus – 150,000 military, police and auxiliaries
were deployed during the polls – it seems unlikely at this stage that Uganda will suffer the sort of lethal
meltdown witnessed in nearby Burundi after elections last year. Besigye and the
other leading opposition candidate, Amama Mbabazi, a former prime minister
sacked by Museveni, will certainly strive to avoid the sort of extreme
divisions seen in South Sudan.
But if the situation
deteriorates, and given Museveni’s high-handedness, it is possible that Uganda
will face the sort of long-running, damaging post-election instability seen in
neighbouring Kenya in 2007 and 2013. Addressing a rally in eastern Uganda last
month, Besigye indicated his Forum for Democratic Change party would continue
to challenge what he characterised as a complacent, corrupt presidency for
life. Besigye lampooned Museveni’s famous slogan celebrating Uganda’s steady
progress. “I have not met someone as cynical as Museveni,” he said. “This
massive poverty all over the country, he calls it ‘steady progress’. When you
go to a hospital and there are no drugs, ‘steady progress’. All the roads are
bad, ‘steady progress’.” As Kenyans might testify, making a mockery of a
humourless hardman such as Museveni, a latter-day Daniel arap Moi, is a
dangerous game.
Museveni’s clinging to
power would not matter so much if he were offering a fresh programme mapping
Uganda’s road ahead. Instead, he offers more of the same. By dismissing
Mbabazi, a respected party technocrat once seen as his heir, he squandered the
chance of an orderly transition within the ruling National Resistance Movement.
By failing to quash suspicions that he may promote his wife, Janet, or son,
Muhoozi Kainerugaba, as successor, he risks accusations of dynasty politics
like the Mugabes in Zimbabwe (or the Bushes and Clintons). Like another eternal
president, Paul Kagame in next-door Rwanda, Museveni sets a poor
example for African democracy and governance. By obstructing Uganda’s changing
needs and aspirations with his grimly immovable presence, he does the nation a
disservice.
guer·ril·la
A member of a
small independent group taking part in irregular fighting, typically against
larger regular forces.
hei·nous
(of a person
or wrongful act, especially a crime) utterly odious or wicked.
jeop·ard·ize
Put (someone
or something) into a situation in which there is a danger of loss, harm, or
failure.
op·press
Keep (someone)
in subservience and hardship, especially by the unjust exercise of authority.
tar·nish
Lose or cause
to lose luster, especially as a result of exposure to air or moisture.
prej·u·dice
Preconceived
opinion that is not based on reason or actual experience
no·to·ri·ous
Famous or well
known, typically for some bad quality or deed.
balk
Hesitate or be
unwilling to accept an idea or undertaking.
de·fi·ance
Open
resistance; bold disobedience.
spe·cious
Superficially
plausible, but actually wrong.
crack·down
Severe
measures to restrict or discourage undesirable or illegal people or behavior.
stem
Originate in
or be caused by.
le·thal
Sufficient to
cause death.
strive
Make great
efforts to achieve or obtain something.
com·pla·cent
Showing smug
or uncritical satisfaction with oneself or one's achievements.
cling·ing
(of a garment)
fitting closely to the body and showing its shape.
squan·der
Waste
(something, especially money or time) in a reckless and foolish manner.
grimly
In a grim
implacable manner; "he was grimly satisfied"
dis·serv·ice
A harmful
action.
BUSINESS STANDARD: Jat stir: Unemployment is the real problem
The government's apparent willingness to capitulate to
violent protesters from the Jat community in Haryana is unfortunate. It has
been reported that, after Union Home Minister Rajnath Singh met some leaders of
the protest, the Centre agreed to set up a committee to examine the demand, and
that the Haryana state government - also led by the Bharatiya Janata Party -
would introduce a Bill to grant Jats the status of Other Backward Classes (OBC)
in the state. This followed an agitation in which legislators' houses were
burnt down, trains and trucks were attacked, highways in and out of Delhi cut
off, and a canal that supplied water to Delhi taken over. The state
administration's response has been dilatory and confused. Eventually the Army
was called out, and the canal is reported to have been secured, with Delhi's
water supply expected to be restored soon. The agitation refused to peter out
on Monday, with several roads into Delhi blocked, including National Highway 1.
Over the 11 days of the agitation, at least 11 people have died and 150 have been
injured.
Giving in to such demands when expressed with violence sets an unfortunate precedent. The Jat community in Haryana is locally dominant, with strong presence in politics and control of many local institutions like panchayats, and should not normally be seen as a candidate for quotas. Naturally, its local dominance permits it to challenge the forces of the state more effectively than genuinely marginalised communities. Such open confrontation with the forces of law and order should not be rewarded with an apparent victory. This is doubly important because the Jats are not alone in agitating for OBC status and the benefits in government employment that it provides. Of late, other such locally dominant land-owning castes and communities across the country have agitated for this status. Gujarat was brought to its knees last year by a protest led on behalf of the Patidar community, generally called Patels. Like the Jats, Patidars are extremely influential in local and state politics. Similarly, earlier this year the state of Andhra Pradesh was rocked by violence by the Kapu community, another locally powerful land-owning caste, demanding inclusion in the backward classes list in the state.
It is clear that a common rationale must lie behind such seemingly similar demands - one that is born of similar economic transformations in such socially disparate regions. Land-owning castes have struggled with the fragmentation of land holdings. Although, by some estimates, only 10 per cent of Jats in Haryana are landless, fragmentation means that each land-owning family has less of an asset than it did a generation ago. Meanwhile, other communities have prospered in the modern economy, upending the rural hierarchy and challenging the Jats' or the Patidars' local supremacy. And the jobs that the private sector was supposed to create in order to replace farming have not materialised in full measure - and where they have, locally dominant castes may feel that they have not been able to corner them to the extent that they deserved. This underlines the need to expand employment opportunities in rural and semi-urban areas - which means the pro-industry reform agenda must not be abandoned. But till those jobs materialise, giving in to violent demands is a dangerous route to take.
Giving in to such demands when expressed with violence sets an unfortunate precedent. The Jat community in Haryana is locally dominant, with strong presence in politics and control of many local institutions like panchayats, and should not normally be seen as a candidate for quotas. Naturally, its local dominance permits it to challenge the forces of the state more effectively than genuinely marginalised communities. Such open confrontation with the forces of law and order should not be rewarded with an apparent victory. This is doubly important because the Jats are not alone in agitating for OBC status and the benefits in government employment that it provides. Of late, other such locally dominant land-owning castes and communities across the country have agitated for this status. Gujarat was brought to its knees last year by a protest led on behalf of the Patidar community, generally called Patels. Like the Jats, Patidars are extremely influential in local and state politics. Similarly, earlier this year the state of Andhra Pradesh was rocked by violence by the Kapu community, another locally powerful land-owning caste, demanding inclusion in the backward classes list in the state.
It is clear that a common rationale must lie behind such seemingly similar demands - one that is born of similar economic transformations in such socially disparate regions. Land-owning castes have struggled with the fragmentation of land holdings. Although, by some estimates, only 10 per cent of Jats in Haryana are landless, fragmentation means that each land-owning family has less of an asset than it did a generation ago. Meanwhile, other communities have prospered in the modern economy, upending the rural hierarchy and challenging the Jats' or the Patidars' local supremacy. And the jobs that the private sector was supposed to create in order to replace farming have not materialised in full measure - and where they have, locally dominant castes may feel that they have not been able to corner them to the extent that they deserved. This underlines the need to expand employment opportunities in rural and semi-urban areas - which means the pro-industry reform agenda must not be abandoned. But till those jobs materialise, giving in to violent demands is a dangerous route to take.
ap·par·ent
Clearly
visible or understood; obvious.
ca·pit·u·late
Cease to
resist an opponent or an unwelcome demand; surrender.
dil·a·to·ry
Slow to act.
prec·e·dent
An earlier
event or action that is regarded as an example or guide to be considered in
subsequent similar circumstances.
dis·pa·rate
Essentially
different in kind; not allowing comparison.
up·end
Set or turn
(something) on its end or upside down.
a·ban·don
Give up
completely (a course of action, a practice, or a way of thinking).
INDIAN EXPRESS: Back off
Umar Khalid,
Anirban Bhattacharya, Riyazul Haq, Rama Naga, Anant Prakash and Ashutosh Kumar,
gone missing since February 12 after JNUSU president Kanhaiya Kumar was arrested
for “sedition”, and also named in the case, spent their first
night back on campus surrounded by fellow students who kept an all-night vigil,
while the police waited outside the gates. In this moment of pause, the
police must ask itself a question: Just where is it going? The facts are these:
The charges against Kanhaiya and others, flimsy to begin with, were based on a
video, cited in the FIR, whose veracity is in serious question. Delhi Police
chief B.S. Bassi has said the onus is on the students “to present evidence of
their innocence”, but surely Bassi is not serious. It cannot be that the police
chief is actually overturning the fundamental principle of criminal
jurisprudence — that you are innocent till proven guilty? The unprecedented
exertions of Delhi Police so far — it has questioned at least 50 people,
including professors and journalists, in the last 10 days, to trace the
whereabouts of one of the missing students — have already made it look like a
misguided, if not malign, force. At the JNU gates, it must decide to cut its
losses, beat a retreat, lest it should disgrace itself further.
It is not just
Delhi Police that needs to pause, and reconsider. At a farmers’ rally in
western Odisha on Sunday, Prime Minister Narendra Modi spoke
of “conspiracies” hatched every day to “finish and defame” him. This was
happening, he suggested, because his government had asked NGOs for details of
their “foreign funding”. Which NGOs was the PM speaking of? And does he see the
turbulence in JNU as one of the many “storms of protest” his government has been
engulfed by, because “these people ganged up against me”? Where is the evidence
for that? And what is the way out? The PM must tell the nation whether or not
he thinks there is a “foreign hand” at work to destabilise his government. In
any case, the entire JNU controversy has been marked by an “us and them”
rhetoric from the top echelons of this government vis-a-vis young university
students. There has been no effort to reach out to them, to play the elder, to
be firm but also compassionate.
On Monday,
addressing the Centenary Year Convocation of Banaras Hindu University in
Varanasi, the PM spoke of the importance of “jigyasa”, curiosity. “The student
in us has to be alive always,” he said. Cut to JNU, where on Sunday night, a
hounded student was forced to say: “My name is Umar Khalid but I am not a
terrorist.” The dissonance is tragic.
Back off
to stop being involved in a situation, usually in order to allowother people to deal with it themselves
vig·il
A period of
keeping awake during the time usually spent asleep, especially to keep watch or
pray.
ve·rac·i·ty
Conformity to
facts; accuracy.
o·nus
Used to refer
to something that is one's duty or responsibility.
un·prec·e·dent·ed
Never done or
known before.
ex·er·tion
Physical or
mental effort.
where·a·bouts
Where or
approximately where.
ma·lign
Evil in nature
or effect; malevolent.
re·treat
(of an army)
withdraw from enemy forces as a result of their superior power or after a
defeat.
tur·bu·lence
Violent or
unsteady movement of air or water, or of some other fluid.
ech·e·lon
A level or
rank in an organization, a profession, or society.
com·pas·sion·ate
Feeling or
showing sympathy and concern for others.
hound
Harass,
persecute, or pursue relentlessly.
dis·so·nance
Lack of
harmony among musical notes.
THE NEWYORK TIMES: Why Are White Death Rates Rising?
IT’S disturbing and
puzzling news: Death rates are rising for white, less-educated Americans. The
economists Anne Case and Angus Deaton reportedin December that rates have
been climbing since 1999 for non-Hispanic whites age 45 to 54, with the largest
increase occurring among the least educated. An analysis of death certificates by
The New York Times found similar trends and showed that the rise may extend to
white women.
Both studies attributed
the higher death rates to increases in poisonings and chronic liver disease,
which mainly reflect drug overdoses and alcohol abuse, and to suicides. In
contrast, death rates fell overall for blacks and Hispanics.
Why are whites
overdosing or drinking themselves to death at higher rates than
African-Americans and Hispanics in similar circumstances? Some observers have
suggested that higher rates of chronic opioid prescriptionscould be
involved, along with whites’ greater pessimism about their finances.
Yet I’d like to propose
a different answer: what social scientists call reference group theory. The
term “reference group” was pioneered by the social psychologist Herbert H.
Hyman in 1942, and the theory wasdeveloped by the Columbia sociologist
Robert K. Merton in the 1950s. It tells us that to comprehend how people think
and behave, it’s important to understand the standards to which they compare
themselves.
How is your life going?
For most of us, the answer to that question means comparing our lives to the
lives our parents were able to lead. As children and adolescents, we closely
observed our parents. They were our first reference group.
And here is one solution
to the death-rate conundrum: It’s likely that many non-college-educated whites
are comparing themselves to a generation that had more opportunities than they
have, whereas many blacks and Hispanics are comparing themselves to a
generation that had fewer opportunities.
When whites without
college degrees look back, they can often remember fathers who were sustained
by the booming industrial economy of postwar America. Since then, however, the
industrial job market has slowed significantly. The hourly wages of male high
school graduates declined by 14 percent from 1973 to 2012, according to
analysis of data from the Economic Policy Institute. Although high school
educated white women haven’t experienced the same major reversal of the job
market, they may look at their husbands — or, if they are single, to the men
they choose not to marry — and reason that life was better when they were
growing up.
African-Americans,
however, didn’t get a fair share of the blue-collar prosperity of the postwar
period. They may look back to a time when discrimination deprived their parents
of equal opportunities. Many Hispanics may look back to the lower standard of
living their parents experienced in their countries of origin. Whites are
likely to compare themselves to a reference group that leads them to feel worse
off. Blacks and Hispanics compare themselves to reference groups that may make
them feel better off.
The sociologist Timothy
Nelson and I observed this phenomenon in interviews with high-school-educated
young adult men in 2012 and 2013. A 35-year-old white man who did construction
jobs said, “It’s much harder for me as a grown man than it was for my father.”
He remembered his father saying that back when he was 35, “‘I had a house and I
had five kids or four kids.’ You know, ‘Look where I was at.’ And I’m like,
‘Well, Dad, things have changed.’”
African-American men
were more upbeat. One said: “I think there are better opportunities now because
first of all, the economy’s changing. The color barrier is not as harsh as it
was back then.” In addition, national surveys show striking racial and ethnic
differences in satisfaction with one’s social standing relative to one’s
parents. The General Social Survey conducted by the research organization NORC
at the University of Chicago has asked Americans in its biennial surveys to
compare their standard of living to that of their parents. In 2014, according
to my analysis, among 25- to 54-year-olds without college degrees, blacks and
Hispanics were much more positive than whites: 67 percent of African-Americans
and 68 percent of Hispanics responded “much better” or “somewhat better,”
compared with 47 percent of whites.
Those figures represent
a reversal from 2000, when whites were more positive than blacks, 64 percent to
60 percent. (Hispanics were the most positive in nearly all years.)
But we size ourselves up
based on more than just our parents. White workers historically have compared
themselves against black workers, taking some comfort in seeing a group that
was doing worse than them. Now, however, the decline of racial restrictions in
the labor market and the spread of affirmative action have changed that.
Non-college-graduate whites in the General Social Survey are more likely to
agree that “conditions for black people have improved” than are comparable
blacks themselves, 68 percent to 53 percent.
Reference group theory
explains why people who have more may feel that they have less. What matters is
to whom you are comparing yourself. It’s not that white workers are doing worse
than African-Americans or Hispanics.
In the fourth quarter of
2015, the median weekly earnings of white men aged 25 to 54 were
$950, well above the same figure for black men ($703) and Hispanic men ($701).
But for some whites — perhaps the ones who account for the increasing death
rate — that may be beside the point. Their main reference group is their
parents’ generation, and by that standard they have little to look forward to
and a lot to lament.
His·pan·ic
Of or relating
to Spain or to Spanish-speaking countries, especially those of Latin America.
co·nun·drum
A confusing
and difficult problem or question.
de·prived
Suffering a
severe and damaging lack of basic material and cultural benefits
worse off.
poorer or in a more difficult situation:
upbeat
full of hope, happiness, and good feelings
la·ment
A passionate
expression of grief or sorrow.
The Dawn: Poor state
of health
ONE of the most dismal numbers to come out of Pakistan is
the paltry allocation of budgetary resources to health.
The figure
stands below 0.7pc of GDP, both provincial and federal combined, and is among
the smallest expenditure heads in the budget.
Even for a
country known for its misallocation of resources, the smallness of this number
is staggering, especially when we consider the kind of health emergencies that
plague the land.
From
diseases such as polio, TB and hepatitis, to malnutrition among a large
proportion of the population, to high infant and child mortality rates — among
the highest in the region — Pakistan shoulders some of the world’s biggest
health-related burdens. How then do we justify such meagre resource allocation
to the health sector?
Economic
surveys that are the government’s own telling of the health story show that the
myriad programmes being run in the health sector are the authorities’ response
to the challenge.
Data is
presented on the availability of food, which, apparently, is sufficient to
handle the nutritional needs of the entire country.
The
availability of cereal, pulses and milk has only increased over the past five
years. However, the data on calorie intake shows a deterioration, with 22pc of
our population in the undernourishment category and in the same league as
countries that are food deficient.
Lack of food
then is not the issue; the problem is how the food that is available is
allocated, whether through market mechanisms that are highly distorted by
speculative interests or through an ineffective, corrupt government.
The story is
the same whether one looks at hospitals and medicines, or access to doctors. In
general terms as well, both the centre and the provinces are more geared
towards serving the interests of the rich, through the construction of roads
and bridges, than of the poor.
Public-sector
spending on health, which is the mainstay for meeting the health requirements
of the poor, is a dismal 0.7pc of GDP as mentioned above. But when one adds
private-sector spending, the figure jumps to 2.8pc of GDP; this is four times
what is spent on the poor.
This shows
that whatever allocation of resources to the health sector there is in the
country, most of it is through private healthcare providers that serve the
interests of those with more money.
It is no
exaggeration to say that the poor have been left to their own devices while the
rich have built for themselves a comfortable world where all basic needs are
amply catered for, and sealed away behind a wall of high prices.
The state of
public health in the country paints a truly dismal picture, especially when it
comes to the skewed manner of the allocation of available resources.
dis·mal
Depressing;
dreary
pal·try
(of an amount)
small or meager.
stag·ger
Walk or move unsteadily,
as if about to fall.
mea·ger
(of something
provided or available) lacking in quantity or quality.
myr·i·ad
A countless or
extremely great number.
ex·ag·ger·a·tion
A statement
that represents something as better or worse than it really is.
amply
To an ample
degree or in an ample manner; "these voices were amply represented";
"we benefited richly"
ca·ter
Provide food
and drink, typically at social events and in a professional capacity.
No comments:
Post a Comment